Apr 30
2020

Sheffield, UK: 9 Million Road Journeys Viewable

Anyone would presume that this could never happen. Basically if you knew someone’s number plate, you could see where they had travelled, simply by visiting the system’s URL.

Sheffield City Council’s automatic number-plate recognition (ANPR) system exposed to the internet 8.6 million records of road journeys made by thousands of people.

The ANPR camera system’s internal management dashboard could be accessed by simply entering its IP address into a web browser. No login details or authentication of any sort was needed to view and search the live system – which logs where and when vehicles, identified by their number plates, travel through Sheffield’s road network.
The Register

Posted in Government Surveillance | Leave a comment
Dec 01
2019

“Gridding” with License Plate Readers

alpr-on-police-car-777x437

Basically, when police aren’t needed for something else, they drive around neighbourhoods and their equipment records the license plate of every vehicle they drive past, and records the location and time. This also occurs when they are to and from police business.

The massive database they create is useful for proving when and where a vehicle was as evidence for crimes. Of course that is good.

It is also surveillance of mostly innocent people, and such data could be used unlawfully.

It is the equivalent of phone-tapping everyone, except phone calls are “private” and your car being somewhere is “public”.

More here:
https://www.technocracy.news/police-use-license-plate-readers-to-grid-neighborhoods/

 

Posted in Government Surveillance | Leave a comment
Jun 29
2019

Cardiac signature at 200 meters

So, supposedly, our heartbeats form a “cardiac signature” that is more unique than our faces.

An individual’s cardiac signature is unique, though, and unlike faces or gait, it remains constant and cannot be altered or disguised.

A new device, developed for the Pentagon after US Special Forces requested it, can identify people without seeing their face: instead it detects their unique cardiac signature with an infrared laser. While it works at 200 meters (219 yards), longer distances could be possible with a better laser.

…the new device, called Jetson, uses a technique known as laser vibrometry to detect the surface movement caused by the heartbeat. This works though typical clothing like a shirt and a jacket (though not thicker clothing such as a winter coat).

So, won’t work so good during winter. Otherwise, kinda hard to avoid unless you have some kind of vibrating device built into your clothing.

Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/613891/the-pentagon-has-a-laser-that-can-identify-people-from-a-distanceby-their-heartbeat/

Posted in Government Surveillance | Leave a comment
Mar 30
2019

Terahertz Scanners

In mid-August the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Transportation Security Administration announced Metro has paid $100,000 each for several TSA-approved portable terahertz millimeter-wave screening devices. Made by the U.K.-based company ThruVision, the devices will be deployed within the city’s metro rail system to detect at a distance weapons capable of causing mass casualties.

https://medium.com/scientific-american/will-l-a-s-anti-terrorist-subway-scanners-be-adopted-everywhere-4db8a4de1c22

Operators compare CCTV footage with what the scanners see – which is cold patches around the body that could mean a suicide vest or weapon. Someone suspicious will be assessed by sniffer dogs.

And the scanners have a range of 10 metres, which is handy, and works on people in motion.

But the technology seems to have some serious problems:

The device cannot see inside bodies, backpacks or shoes.

In a demonstration of the system at ThruVision’s offices, the operator immediately spotted the large bunch of keys in my back left pocket but didn’t notice the closed medium-size Swiss Army knife in my back right pocket until told it was there. He was unsurprised: the knife is about the smallest size they expect to be detectable at that distance and resolution, and it is not among the items LA Metro wants to detect.

 

 

Posted in Government Surveillance | Leave a comment
Feb 12
2019

Remote Hacking of iPhones is Real

This is big. Most hacking requires the phone user to click on something. This doesn’t, and the suggestion is that many government agencies have been using it.

Karma reportedly didn’t work on Android devices, but was deemed especially powerful as it could plant malware on an iPhone without requiring an action from the target. Three former operatives said the tool relied partially on a flaw in iMessage. All it supposedly took to trigger the breach was for a text message to be sent to the target device using the cyber-tool.

…Ultimately, the tool was apparently used to gain entry into the accounts of hundreds of prominent Middle Eastern political figures and activists across the region and in Europe.

In a separate Reuters exposé, Lori Stroud (a former NSA staffer who later joined Project Raven) said Karma was also used to spy on American citizens.

https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/30/uae-surveillance-iphone-hacking/

Posted in Government Surveillance, Spy Equipment | Leave a comment
Dec 11
2018

Anonymous Location Data – Not Anonymous

If all of your details are removed from your location data, is it anonymous?

Screen Shot 2018-12-11 at 9.19.32 pm

No, because people have homes and jobs that they go to most days. And pretty much every combination of home and job location is unique and identifiable.

Marketers won’t care about individuals, but data can be resold to bad actors or governments.

Excellent article from the NY Times:

Yet another [anonymised journey data] leaves a house in upstate New York at 7 a.m. and travels to a middle school 14 miles away, staying until late afternoon each school day. Only one person makes that trip: Lisa Magrin, a 46-year-old math teacher. Her smartphone goes with her.

An app on the device gathered her location information, which was then sold without her knowledge. It recorded her whereabouts as often as every two seconds, according to a database of more than a million phones in the New York area that was reviewed by The New York Times. While Ms. Magrin’s identity was not disclosed in those records, The Times was able to easily connect her to that dot.

The app tracked her as she went to a Weight Watchers meeting and to her dermatologist’s office for a minor procedure. It followed her hiking with her dog and staying at her ex-boyfriend’s home, information she found disturbing.

Posted in Avoiding Detection, Corporate Surveillance, Identification and Personal Data | Leave a comment
Jul 14
2018

Regulating Facial Recognition

surveillanc

While privacy laws around such thinks as spam email have evolved alongside the technological advancements, the same cannot be said about real world privacy.

Current laws were drafted when hand-held video cameras had poor resolution, before surveillance cameras were everywhere, and of course before smart phones.

It used to be that your public movements and actions were never recorded. Now it is almost the opposite – before long they will always be recorded.

New laws are required to stop the misuse of such recordings.

If you, specifically, are being recorded, your permission is required. Exceptions would be law enforcement, licensed security firms, and licensed news reporters. Specifically, means the purpose of the filming, as opposed to you incidentally being filmed.

You own the rights of your public activities for commercial purposes. If you are filmed doing something, say falling down escalators, others cannot sell that footage without your approval. Again, licensed reporters are exempt.

Facial recognition is illegal for commercial purposes, without your prior, specific approval. It can’t be buried away in terms and conditions.

There’d probably also need to be restrictions against some non-commercial use, like Neighbourhood Watch.

Microsoft today predicted such laws, by asking for them:
https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-calls-for-federal-regulation-of-facial-recognition

 

 

Posted in Corporate Surveillance, Facial Recognition | Leave a comment
Jun 13
2018

Stingray & Parallel Constructions

The police in the USA use stingrays to illegally snoop on suspects, recording calls and precisely locating them. The problem is, they can’t use it as evidence. So they then pretend to have received their intel from more legitimate sources, often other law enforcement agencies.

First described in government documents obtained by Reuters in 2013, parallel construction is when law enforcement originally obtains evidence through a secret surveillance program, then tries to seek it out again, via normal procedure. In essence, law enforcement creates a parallel, alternative story for how it found information. That way, it can hide surveillance techniques from public scrutiny and would-be criminals.

However, if a clever defence lawyer can deduce this is happening, they have a lot of bargaining power.

IN 2013, 18-YEAR-OLD Tadrae McKenzie robbed a marijuana dealer for $130 worth of pot at a Taco Bell in Tallahassee, Florida. He and two friends had used BB guns to carry out the crime, which under Florida law constitutes robbery with a deadly weapon. McKenzie braced himself to serve the minimum four years in prison.

But in the end, a state judge offered McKenzie a startlingly lenient plea deal: He was ordered to serve only six months’ probation, after pleading guilty to a second-degree misdemeanor.

Story: Wired

Posted in Government Surveillance, Spy Equipment | Leave a comment
Jun 05
2018

Stingray Used Near White House

“The news of a possible foreign stingray near the White House is of particular concern giving reports that the President isn’t even using a secure phone to protect his calls,” Wyden said in response.

“The cavalier attitude toward our national security appears to be coming from the top down.”

Full story at The Register

Posted in Spy Equipment | Leave a comment
May 10
2018

Don’t Share Your DNA…

…if you have committed a crime. Those DNA services are sharing your data to 3rd parties, including law enforcement.

Relative’s DNA from genealogy websites cracked East Area Rapist case, DA’s office says
used “open-source” site GEDmatch to help law enforcement make the DNA connection.
http://www.sacbee.com/latest-news/article209913514.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment